e-ISSN: 2792-0429
Intended versus delivered parenteral nutrition in the pediatric intensive care units: A multi-center survey [TP]
TP. 2023; 4(3): 180-185 | DOI: 10.59213/TP.2023.63825

Intended versus delivered parenteral nutrition in the pediatric intensive care units: A multi-center survey

Zeynelabidin Öztürk1, Sevgi Topal2, Ebru Kaçmaz3, Dinçer Yıldızdaş4, Murat Kanğın5, Mustafa Çolak2, Ener Çağrı Dinleyici3, Benan Bayrakcı6
1University of Health Sciences, Dr. Sami Ulus Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pediatric Health and Disease Training and Research Hospital, Department of Pediatric Intensive Care Medicine, Ankara, Türkiye
2University of Health Sciences, Dr. Behçet Uz Pediatric Diseases and Surgery Training and Research Hospital, Department of Pediatric Intensive Care Medicine, İzmir, Türkiye
3Eskişehir Osmangazi University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pediatric Intensive Care Medicine, Eskişehir, Türkiye
4Çukurova University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pediatric Intensive Care Medicine, Adana, Türkiye
5Gazi Yaşargil Training and Research Hospital, Department of Pediatric Intensive Care Medicine, Diyarbakır, Türkiye
6Hacettepe University, Center for Life Support Practice and Research, Department of Pediatric Intensive Care Medicine, Ankara, Türkiye

Objective: Prevention and management of malnutrition are important in critically ill children. Parenteral nutrition (PN) is considered for patients who cannot tolerate enteral feeding. There are many reasons why PN cannot be delivered in the prescribed amount. We aimed to evaluate whether PN is delivered as prescribed in the pediatric intensive care units and to reveal the reasons for failure.
Method: Demographics, pediatric risk of mortality (PRISM) III scores, predicted death rates (PDR), indications for PN, duration of PN, vascular access site, daily amount of prescribed and delivered PN, reasons for not receiving PN as prescribed, and whether renal replacement therapy (RRT) was received were noted. The delivered/prescribed PN volume ratio was compared by gender, age, PRISM III score, PDR, indications for PN, duration of PN, and vascular access site.
Results: The most common indication for PN was failing to meet the targeted energy enterally (n=51, 69.9%). The duration of PN was ≤ 7 days in 40 (54.8%) patients and the type of vascular access was jugular venous catheter in 46 (63%) patients. 16 (21.9%) patients received RRT. PN was administered for 906 PN-days and the patients received the prescribed volume on 698 PN-days (77%). The most common reasons for not receiving the PN volume as prescribed were volume restrictions (n= 29, 39.7%) and electrolyte imbalance (n=13, 17.8%). Age, gender, weight, duration of PN, vascular access site, receiving RRT, PRISM III score, and PDR were not associated with receiving more than 0.8 of the prescribed PN volume. All gastrointestinal surgery patients received more than 0.8 of the prescribed amount.
Conclusion: In about a quarter of PN-days, the prescribed volume could not be delivered, often due to volume restrictions in the pediatric intensive care units. Setting the correct nutritional targets, individualizing nutritional support, and preventing and overcoming obstacles on the way to the targets may improve outcomes.

Keywords: Critically ill, malnutrition, outcomes, parenteral nutrition, pediatric intensive care

Zeynelabidin Öztürk, Sevgi Topal, Ebru Kaçmaz, Dinçer Yıldızdaş, Murat Kanğın, Mustafa Çolak, Ener Çağrı Dinleyici, Benan Bayrakcı. Intended versus delivered parenteral nutrition in the pediatric intensive care units: A multi-center survey. TP. 2023; 4(3): 180-185

Corresponding Author: Zeynelabidin Öztürk, Türkiye
Manuscript Language: English