Abstract

Background: This study aimed to assess the spectrum and prevalence of endocrine disorders in pediatric patients with midline brain abnormalities (MBA).

Methods: This retrospective observational study was conducted at a tertiary pediatric endocrinology center and included patients younger than 18 years of age with MBA. Clinical data were obtained from medical records.

Results: The study included 17 patients (52.9% male) with a median age of 11.1 (8.9–15.7) years. The median age at first admission was 5.3 (1.5–9.9) years, and the median follow-up period was 6.8 (2.1–7.9) years. The most common clinical finding at admission was short stature (29.5%). Brain magnetic resonance imaging most frequently revealed corpus callosum abnormalities (52.9%), followed by septo-optic dysplasia (17.6%). Endocrine disorders were present in 82.3% of patients with MBA. The most frequently observed endocrine disorder was multiple pituitary hormone deficiency (41.2%). In addition, isolated endocrine disorders such as central hypothyroidism (17.6%), growth hormone deficiency (11.8%), diabetes insipidus (5.9%), and hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (5.9%) were observed. When each endocrine disorder was evaluated individually, central hypothyroidism emerged as the most frequently identified condition (58.8%). Three patients had no detectable endocrine dysfunction.

Conclusions: Endocrine disorders were observed in 82.3% of patients with MBA, with central hypothyroidism being the most common when considered individually. The high prevalence of endocrine disorders in children with MBA underscores the importance of routine endocrine screening in this population.

Keywords: children, endocrine disorders, hypopituitarism, midline brain abnormalities

INTRODUCTION

The hypothalamus, pituitary gland, and other endocrine organs play a crucial role in regulating growth, reproduction, metabolism, and fluid balance.1 The pituitary gland originates from the Rathke’s pouch and the neuroectoderm of the diencephalon, with its development occurring around the sixth to seventh week of embryogenesis. Congenital and developmental abnormalities of the hypothalamic-pituitary axis include pituitary hypoplasia or agenesis, ectopic posterior pituitary, absence of the pituitary bright spot, duplication of the pituitary gland or stalk, empty sella syndrome, and various midline congenital anomalies. Additionally, midline structural defects such as optic nerve hypoplasia, absence of the septum pellucidum, and corpus callosum abnormalities may coexist with these conditions.2

Children with midline brain abnormalities (MBA) often present with neurological impairments, including developmental delay and hydrocephalus.3 Given the potential risk of morbidity and mortality associated with undiagnosed endocrinopathies, recognizing the clinical manifestations of hormone deficiencies in these patients is essential. Hypopituitarism, if left undiagnosed, may lead to severe complications such as hypoglycemia, adrenal crisis, and increased mortality.4 Reports in the literature suggest that the prevalence of endocrinopathies in children with neuroanatomical anomalies can be as high as 82%.4-8

Pediatric endocrinologists frequently evaluate children and adolescents with MBA to assess potential endocrine dysfunction. In addition to clinical symptoms, anthropometric measurements and laboratory investigations aid in diagnosing various pituitary endocrinopathies.9 Furthermore, brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the hypothalamic-pituitary region is a key diagnostic tool for identifying structural abnormalities associated with endocrine dysfunction.9,10

This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence and spectrum of endocrine disorders in pediatric patients with MBA.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 17 patients diagnosed with MBA. Patients younger than 18 years of age who were followed at a tertiary pediatric endocrinology center for endocrine evaluation due to MBA between January 2011 and January 2021 were enrolled. In some cases, MBA was incidentally detected during neuroimaging performed for non-endocrine indications, while in others, it was identified during evaluation for suspected endocrine dysfunction. Patients diagnosed with an endocrinopathy after the detection of MBA underwent additional hormonal assessments as part of routine endocrine follow-up. Data on patient demographics, including age, sex, age at presentation, auxological measurements, endocrine laboratory findings, and MRI results, were retrieved from medical records. Anthropometric percentiles and standard deviation scores (SDS) were calculated using the Child Metrics online calculator (http://www.childmetrics.com), based on the national child growth reference data for Turkey.11

Exclusion criteria

Patients with acquired brain abnormalities due to trauma, infection, or malignancy were excluded. Additionally, cases with septum pellucidum variation and empty sella, considered normal anatomical variants due to their high prevalence in the general population, were not included in the study.12,13

Endocrine assessments

Clinical findings, baseline laboratory tests, and dynamic endocrine function tests were evaluated by a pediatric endocrinologist. The diagnosis of hypopituitarism was established according to current clinical guidelines.14-18 Growth hormone deficiency (GHD) was defined as an insufficient response to two different stimulation tests, after excluding chronic diseases, in patients with a mean height of less than −2 SDS for sex or a low growth velocity.14 Central hypothyroidism was diagnosed in cases with low or normal thyrotropin (TSH) levels and reduced free thyroxine (FT4) concentrations.15 Central adrenal insufficiency was identified based on morning cortisol levels and confirmed with adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) stimulation tests.16 Central diabetes insipidus was diagnosed using serum and urine osmolality measurements, supplemented by a water deprivation test when necessary.17 Hypogonadism was assessed through luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) levels, as well as responses to a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) stimulation test.18 Multiple pituitary hormone deficiencies (MPHD) were defined as the presence of at least two deficiencies among growth hormone (GH), TSH, ACTH, and gonadotropins.4 MRI scans were reviewed by an experienced neuroradiologist to assess structural abnormalities. All clinical evaluations, endocrine laboratory tests, and imaging assessments were performed as part of routine patient care.

Ethical approval

This retrospective study involving human participants was in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This study was approved by the Clinical Research Ethical Committee of Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty (Approval number: 83045809-604.01.01-370476). Due to the retrospective nature of the study, informed consent was not required.

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS 21.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Categorical variables were expressed as numbers and percentages, while continuous variables were presented as means and standard deviations for normally distributed data. For non-normally distributed continuous variables, the median and interquartile range (25th–75th percentiles) were reported.

RESULTS

The study included 17 patients, of whom 52.9% (n=9) were male, with a median age of 11.1 (8.9–15.7) years. The median age at admission was 5.3 (1.5–9.9) years, and the median follow-up duration was 6.8 (2.1–7.9) years. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory findings of the patients are presented in Table 1. The median SDS for weight, height, and body mass index were -1.51 [(-2.10)–0.3], -2.19 (-3.0–0.66), and -0.15 (-1.85–1.5), respectively. The height SDS values among all patients ranged from -7.26 to +2.75. Tall stature (height SDS: +2.75) was observed in one patient, which is atypical for pituitary hormone deficiencies. The patient was diagnosed with Sotos syndrome, a condition associated with excessive childhood growth. No endocrine abnormalities were detected, and cranial MRI demonstrated corpus callosum hypoplasia.

Table 1. Admission findings of cases
Clinical Finding
n
%
Short stature
5
29.5
Neuromotor retardation
3
17.6
Cleft lip/palate
2
11.8
Optic nerve hypoplasia
1
5.9
Optic nerve hypoplasia + short stature
1
5.9
Electrolyte imbalance
1
5.9
Electrolyte imbalance + cleft lip/palate
1
5.9
Autism
1
5.9
Cryptorchidism
1
5.9
Tall stature
1
5.9

The most frequently observed clinical finding at admission was short stature (29.5%). Additional presenting features included cleft lip/palate, neuromotor delay, optic nerve hypoplasia, electrolyte imbalances, autism, undescended testis, and tall stature (Table 1).

Brain MRI revealed corpus callosum abnormalities as the most common MBA (52.9%). Other malformations included septo-optic dysplasia (SOD), polymicrogyria with pituitary hypoplasia, pituitary stalk interruption syndrome, ectopic neurohypophysis, holoprosencephaly, and Chiari malformation type 1 (Table 2).

Table 2. Brain abnormalities of cases on MRI
Brain Malformation
n
%
Corpus callosum abnormality (agenesis, dysgenesis, hypoplasia)
9
52.9
Septo-optic dysplasia
3
17.6
Polymicrogyria and pituitary hypoplasia
1
5.9
Pituitary stalk interruption syndrome
1
5.9
Ectopic posterior pituitary
1
5.9
Holoprosencephaly
1
5.9
Chiari malformation type 1
1
5.9

Endocrine disorders were identified in 14 patients (82.3%), while no endocrine pathology was detected in three cases. MPHD were observed in 41.2% of the cases, as detailed in Table 3. Additionally, isolated endocrine disorders—including central hypothyroidism, GHD, diabetes insipidus, and hypogonadotropic hypogonadism—were also observed. When each endocrine disorder was evaluated individually, central hypothyroidism was the most frequently identified condition (58.8%, n=10). Among the three cases without endocrine abnormalities, all had corpus callosum abnormalities. One patient presented with hydrocephalus and GHD, along with cavum septum pellucidum et vergae variation, which is considered a normal anatomical variant (Table 3).

Table 3. Endocrine status of cases
Endocrine Disorder
n
%
Multiple pituitary hormone deficiency
7
41.2
Central hypothyroidism + growth hormone deficiency + adrenal insufficiency
2
Central hypothyroidism + adrenal insufficiency
1
Central hypothyroidism + diabetes insipidus
1
Central hypothyroidism + hypogonadotropic hypogonadism
1
Central hypothyroidism + growth hormone deficiency
1
Adrenal insufficiency + diabetes insipidus
1
Central Hypothyroidism
3
17.6
No detected endocrine disorder
3
17.6
Growth hormone deficiency
2
11.8
Diabetes insipidus
1
5.9
Hypogonadotropic hypogonadism
1
5.9

DISCUSSION

This study investigated the relationship between neuroanatomical abnormalities and endocrine dysfunction in patients with MBA. Endocrine disorders were detected in 82.3% of children referred to our tertiary pediatric endocrinology center with MBA. Previous studies have reported the prevalence of endocrinopathies in similar populations to range between 37% and 82%.4-8 Variability in reported prevalence rates may stem from differences in study design and patient selection criteria. Since endocrine dysfunction may develop progressively over time, an initially normal pituitary function does not exclude the possibility of future endocrinopathy. In particular, patients with SOD and hypothalamic-pituitary dysfunction are frequently diagnosed within the first two years of life.19,20 Furthermore, Cerbone et al.6 demonstrated that individuals with SOD may continue to develop hormone deficiencies throughout adolescence. Delayed or missed diagnoses can lead to irreversible complications, increasing both morbidity and mortality risks.5,7,9 Therefore, children with midline cerebral and intracranial malformations require thorough endocrine evaluation and long-term follow-up to monitor potential hormonal dysfunction.5,21

Not all congenital MBA are necessarily associated with hypopituitarism.5,6,22 In our study, corpus callosum anomalies were identified in the three patients without any endocrine dysfunction. Corpus callosum abnormalities are among the most frequently detected MBA during routine prenatal ultrasonography and are associated with more than 200 syndromes.22,23 However, their relationship with endocrine dysfunction remains unclear. While some cases remain asymptomatic, others present with neuromotor impairment, intellectual disability, seizures, and endocrine disorders.3,24 Additionally, associated structural abnormalities, such as gyrus dysplasia and cortical heterotopia, may influence prognosis when combined with corpus callosum anomalies.25 Endocrine dysfunction is particularly common in holoprosencephaly and SOD, as these conditions significantly impact hypothalamic and pituitary development.19,26 In such cases, hormonal deficiencies are more likely to result from hypothalamic dysfunction rather than direct pituitary anomalies.21

The diagnostic utility of brain MRI for detecting endocrinopathies has been debated. Sensitivity and specificity have been reported as 67.9% and 83.3%, respectively, indicating that abnormal MRI findings alone may not reliably predict endocrine dysfunction, nor does a normal MRI exclude the possibility of hormonal abnormalities.7 Nonetheless, MRI remains a valuable tool for identifying structural lesions. Given the lack of standardized guidelines for the endocrinological management of patients with MBA, follow-up and treatment should be individualized.9 Specific MRI abnormalities have been linked to an increased risk of early-onset hypopituitarism, emphasizing the need for lifelong endocrine monitoring in these patients.5,6 Furthermore, the severity of MBA does not always correlate with the degree of endocrine dysfunction.5

The prevalence and distribution of endocrine disorders in children with neuroanatomical abnormalities vary widely. While growth hormone deficiency is frequently cited as the most common endocrinopathy in this population, followed by hypothyroidism, ACTH insufficiency, and diabetes insipidus,8,21 our study identified central hypothyroidism as the most prevalent disorder (52.9%). Qian et al.7 reported that ACTH insufficiency was the most frequently observed endocrine disorder in these cases. Previous research has indicated that patients with MPHD often present with GH and TSH deficiencies as the most common hormonal deficits.27 Pituitary hypoplasia can cause endocrine deficiencies in the spectrum ranging from isolated GHD to panhypopituitarism in patients with SOD. The most common endocrine findings reported in patients with SOD are central hypothyroidism, GHD, and adrenal insufficiency.19,20,28 In our study, patients with SOD exhibited a range of endocrine abnormalities, including hypothyroidism, GHD, and adrenal insufficiency. In holoprosencephaly, endocrine dysfunction—particularly adrenal insufficiency, diabetes insipidus, GHD, and hypogonadism—is frequently observed due to severe midline defects affecting hypothalamic and pituitary development.26 In our study, the patient with holoprosencephaly had both adrenal insufficiency and diabetes insipidus.

Additionally, hypothyroidism has been linked to developmental delay in patients with corpus callosum abnormalities.25 In a study by Qian et al.,7 20.9% of children with developmental delay were diagnosed with hypothyroidism. Congenital central hypothyroidism, characterized by low thyroxine and inappropriately low or normal TSH levels, is often missed in neonatal screening programs that rely solely on TSH measurements. In countries where neonatal screening does not include direct T4 assessment, early detection and treatment may be delayed. Given the high prevalence of endocrine disorders in children with MBA, early diagnosis and timely intervention for central hypothyroidism are critical to minimizing neurological complications and improving long-term outcomes.29

A key limitation of this study is the small sample size, which may limit the generalizability of the findings. Additionally, the retrospective study design did not allow for long-term follow-up, restricting our ability to assess the progression of endocrinopathies over time. Future prospective studies with larger cohorts are needed to better characterize the natural history of endocrine dysfunction in children with MBA.

CONCLUSION

Endocrine disorders were identified in 82.3% of children with MBA, with central hypothyroidism being the most frequently observed endocrinopathy. Given the high prevalence of hormonal dysfunction in this population, routine endocrine assessment should be conducted regardless of the presence or absence of clinical symptoms. Early diagnosis and appropriate management are essential to mitigating morbidity and preventing further neurological impairment. A multidisciplinary approach involving pediatric endocrinologists, neurologists, and radiologists is crucial for optimizing the care of these patients.

Ethical approval

This study has been approved by the Ethics Committee of Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa (approval date 26.04.2022, number 83045809-604.01.01-370476). Due to the retrospective nature of the study, informed consent was not required.

Author contribution

The authors declare contribution to the paper as follows: Study conception and design: YÖ, OE; data collection: YÖ, BD, HT, DT, DAB, OE, SS, OE; analysis and interpretation of results: YÖ, OE; draft manuscript preparation: YÖ, OE. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the article.

Source of funding

The authors declare the study received no funding.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hong GK, Payne SC, Jane JA. Anatomy, physiology, and laboratory evaluation of the pituitary gland. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2016;49:21-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otc.2015.09.002
  2. Chaudhary V, Bano S. Imaging of pediatric pituitary endocrinopathies. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2012;16:682-91. https://doi.org/10.4103/2230-8210.100635
  3. Shankar P, Zamora C, Castillo M. Congenital malformations of the brain and spine. Handb Clin Neurol. 2016;136:1121-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-53486-6.00058-2
  4. Birkebaek NH, Patel L, Wright NB, et al. Endocrine status in patients with optic nerve hypoplasia: relationship to midline central nervous system abnormalities and appearance of the hypothalamic-pituitary axis on magnetic resonance imaging. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003;88:5281-6. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2003-030527
  5. Traggiai C, Stanhope R. Endocrinopathies associated with midline cerebral and cranial malformations. J Pediatr. 2002;140:252-5. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpd.2002.121822
  6. Cerbone M, Güemes M, Wade A, Improda N, Dattani M. Endocrine morbidity in midline brain defects: differences between septo-optic dysplasia and related disorders. EClinicalMedicine. 2020;19:100224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2019.11.017
  7. Qian X, Fouzdar Jain S, Morgan LA, Kruse T, Cabrera M, Suh DW. Neuroimaging and endocrine disorders in paediatric optic nerve hypoplasia. Br J Ophthalmol. 2018;102:906-10. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2017-310763
  8. Haddad NG, Eugster EA. Hypopituitarism and neurodevelopmental abnormalities in relation to central nervous system structural defects in children with optic nerve hypoplasia. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2005;18:853-8. https://doi.org/10.1515/jpem.2005.18.9.853
  9. Brener A, Kozyrev DA, Shiran SI, et al. Incidental findings on brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in pediatric endocrine patients. Endocr Pract. 2020;26:1105-14. https://doi.org/10.4158/EP-2020-0208
  10. Chapman PR, Singhal A, Gaddamanugu S, Prattipati V. Neuroimaging of the pituitary gland: practical anatomy and pathology. Radiol Clin North Am. 2020;58:1115-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcl.2020.07.009
  11. Demir K, Özen S, Konakçı E, Aydın M, Darendeliler F. A Comprehensive online calculator for pediatric endocrinologists: ÇEDD çözüm/TPEDS metrics. J Clin Res Pediatr Endocrinol. 2017;9:182-4. https://doi.org/10.4274/jcrpe.4526
  12. Scoffings DJ, Kurian KM. Congenital and acquired lesions of the septum pellucidum. Clin Radiol. 2008;63:210-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2007.07.008
  13. Chiloiro S, Giampietro A, Bianchi A, et al. Diagnosis of endocrine disease: primary empty sella: a comprehensive review. Eur J Endocrinol. 2017;177:R275-85. https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-17-0505
  14. Collett-Solberg PF, Ambler G, Backeljauw PF, et al. Diagnosis, genetics, and therapy of short stature in children: a growth hormone research society international perspective. Horm Res Paediatr. 2019;92:1-14. https://doi.org/10.1159/000502231
  15. Wassner AJ. Pediatric hypothyroidism: diagnosis and treatment. Paediatr Drugs. 2017;19:291-301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40272-017-0238-0
  16. Patti G, Guzzeti C, Di Iorgi N, et al. Central adrenal insufficiency in children and adolescents. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2018;32:425-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beem.2018.03.012
  17. Baldeweg SE, Ball S, Brooke A, et al. Society for endocrinology clinical guidance: inpatient management of cranial diabetes insipidus. Endocr Connect. 2018;7:G8-11. https://doi.org/10.1530/EC-18-0154
  18. Zhu J, Feldman HA, Eugster EA, et al. Practice variation in the management of girls and boys with delayed puberty. Endocr Pract. 2020;26:267-84. https://doi.org/10.4158/EP-2019-0344
  19. Cemeroglu AP, Coulas T, Kleis L. Spectrum of clinical presentations and endocrinological findings of patients with septo-optic dysplasia: a retrospective study. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2015;28:1057-63. https://doi.org/10.1515/jpem-2015-0008
  20. Alt C, Shevell MI, Poulin C, Rosenblatt B, Saint-Martin C, Srour M. Clinical and radiologic spectrum of septo-optic dysplasia: review of 17 cases. J Child Neurol. 2017;32:797-803. https://doi.org/10.1177/0883073817707300
  21. Garcia-Filion P, Borchert M. Optic nerve hypoplasia syndrome: a review of the epidemiology and clinical associations. Curr Treat Options Neurol. 2013;15:78-89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11940-012-0209-2
  22. des Portes V, Rolland A, Velazquez-Dominguez J, et al. Outcome of isolated agenesis of the corpus callosum: a population-based prospective study. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2018;22:82-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpn.2017.08.003
  23. Sotiriadis A, Makrydimas G. Neurodevelopment after prenatal diagnosis of isolated agenesis of the corpus callosum: an integrative review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;206:337.e1-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2011.12.024
  24. D’Antonio F, Pagani G, Familiari A, et al. Outcomes associated with isolated agenesis of the corpus callosum: a meta-analysis. Pediatrics. 2016;138:e20160445. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2016-0445
  25. Garcia-Filion P, Epport K, Nelson M, et al. Neuroradiographic, endocrinologic, and ophthalmic correlates of adverse developmental outcomes in children with optic nerve hypoplasia: a prospective study. Pediatrics. 2008;121:e653-9. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2007-1825
  26. Dubourg C, Bendavid C, Pasquier L, Henry C, Odent S, David V. Holoprosencephaly. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2007;2:8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1750-1172-2-8
  27. Blum WF, Deal C, Zimmermann AG, et al. Development of additional pituitary hormone deficiencies in pediatric patients originally diagnosed with idiopathic isolated GH deficiency. Eur J Endocrinol. 2013;170:13-21. https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-13-0643
  28. Murray A, Schwartz T, Hornung L, Lawson S. Pituitary deficiencies related to optic nerve hypoplasia and visual acuity. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2024;101:507-15. https://doi.org/10.1111/cen.15125
  29. Fink C, Vedin AM, Garcia-Filion P, Ma NS, Geffner ME, Borchert M. Newborn thyroid-stimulating hormone in children with optic nerve hypoplasia: associations with hypothyroidism and vision. J AAPOS. 2012;16:418-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaapos.2012.05.012

How to cite

1.
Özer Y, Turan H, Tarçın G, Bingöl Aydın D, Demirtaş B, Evliyaoğlu O, et al. Midline brain abnormalities and associated endocrine dysfunctions: a clinical and MRI-based study. Trends in Pediatrics. 2025;Early View:1-6. https://doi.org/10.59213/TP.2025.261